Re: TTL target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 24 July 2004 12:24 pm, adderek wrote:

> David Cary Hart wrote:
> > I must ask a dumb question. Why would one want to mangle TTL or filter
> > on TTL?
>
> For example if you want to make little network with your frends where
> everyone pay their part of internet-connection price and you don't want
> anyone to connect more than one computer into it so they can't make
> their own subnetworks to pay less than others.

What stops them doing the same thing with the TTL value in their packets, 
before they reach you?

Or just using a proxy which creates its own packets anyway?

Or using an SSH tunnel to forward the other traffic?

Or using a different O/S which sets a different initial TTL value than you're 
assuming, when it sends packets?

Antony.

-- 
The words "e pluribus unum" on the Great Seal of the United States are from a 
poem by Virgil entitled "Moretum", which is about cheese and garlic salad 
dressing.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux