Re: TTL target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 23 July 2004 9:35 pm, Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN wrote:

> sorry for being a wet blanket - so to speak.
>
> if stateless defense algortihms are employed, the need to retain state in
> order to make proper decisions.
>
> i suspect that much of todays netsec and / or ids software violates one of
> the main premises of coding securely [re: cheswick / bellovin / comer /
> farmer / venema / etc...

Sorry; I tried to follow your posting, but found it a bit obscure.

Is there a succinct version of the point you were making?

(Hopefully, one or two sentences?)

Thanks,

Antony.

-- 
This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above 
and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or unsuitable 
for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour, or 
irrational religious beliefs.

If you have received this email in error, you are required to shred it 
immediately, add some nutmeg, three egg whites and a dessertspoonful of 
caster sugar.   Whisk until soft peaks form, then place in a warm oven for 40 
minutes.   Remove promptly and let stand for 2 hours before adding some 
decorative kiwi fruit and cream.   Then notify me immediately by return email 
and eat the original message.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux