Somebody told methere are situations where you can specify to voip software(or hardware, i have no ideea how voip works) which ip should expect to have for port forward situations. Well seems i have to stay with windows and winproxy who like to suggest to browsers to download index.html from google.com :), and no QoS. Thank you for clarifying On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:48:30 +0100, Antony Stone <antony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2004 3:31 pm, George Alexandru Dragoi wrote: > > > That is what i wanted to do, with 2 NICs to make a bridge between > > internet and the LAN, assign the public ip to one of the LAN machine, > > and prite ips to the rest of machines, and to hope it will work, seems > > not, i hoped i could do this. > > No. With 2 NICs you can either bridge, or route, but not both. > > With 3 NICs you could bridge 2 of them together, and route between the bridged > pair and the 3rd NIC, however in this situation I think you would need to > have an IP address on the bridged pair, and you say you have only 1 public IP > address available? > > > If the voip hardware/software wont work > > in nat with port forward, i wont change there with linux. > > Maybe there is a suggestion for that voip, or if i can do this with 3 > > NICs, and 1 single public IP. > > With only 1 public IP address I think you are stuck as soon as you assign that > address to any machine except the VoIP server. > > Why do people keep on coming up with protocols which don't work across NAT? > > NAT works at OSI layer 3. Any higher level protocols should not care about > it. > > Regards, > > Antony. > > -- > There's no such thing as bad weather - only the wrong clothes. > > - Billy Connolly > > > > Please reply to the list; > please don't CC me. > >
