Re: -p protocol question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 08:58, wschroed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> I am currently writing a mini how-to for a SANS paper

Always a good cause. ;-)

> Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
> but iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -s 192.168.0.1 --sport 5000 -d
> 192.168.0.22 --dport 56 -j ACCEPT works.

As it should.

> Now, according to the man page, the argument to -p can be tcp,udp,icmp,all
> or a number representing a protocol in /etc/protocols or a name from
> /etc/protocols. I have found that in reality iptables yields the same
> error above for anything expcept tcp.udp,icmp or their associated numbers.
> What have I missed -or- is the man page wrong?

Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly, you are trying to define
port numbers for other protocols besides TCP and UDP? If so, I think
your problem is that only TCP and UDP use port numbers. There is no
comparable application with other transports (at least none that I'm
aware of).

HTH,
Chris
 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux