Re: IPSec - IPTables issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: IPSec - IPTables issues
From: Patrick Turley <pturley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 19:21:07 -0500
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4098FE7A.8070707@pbl.ca>
References: <20040502155538.GD515@schottelius.org> <4096317F.8020609@eurodev.net> <20040504211557.GA236@schottelius.org> <4098FE7A.8070707@pbl.ca>
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208)

Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:

Nico Schottelius wrote:

I'll compare what freeswan did with what Linux 2.6 does now:

[... many interesting facts...]

I'm reading this thread with great interest and I'm curious about the new implementation. Specificaly, does anyone know if the firewall marks on packets are preserved after they are encrypted?

References:
- Re: IPSec - IPTables issues
  - From: Nico Schottelius
- Re: IPSec - IPTables issues
  - From: Aleksandar Milivojevic

Prev by Date: Re: Internet satellite link.
Next by Date: string.patch - iptables-1.2.6a/ linux-2.6.5
Previous by thread: Re: IPSec - IPTables issues
Next by thread: Re: IPSec - IPTables issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux