On Wednesday 05 May 2004 5:12 pm, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Antony Stone wrote:
> > That's the way FreeS/WAN does it.
>
> Yes, I know that's the way FreeS/WAN implements it. But it doesn't mean
> it is the only way it can be implemented.
Well that is certainly true, but if you are using FreeS/WAN then this is the
system you have to work with.
> Actually, I like better Linux 2.6 implementation that doesn't use virtual
> devices.
Yes, it seems like a better design; now if only we could work out how to
filter the unencrypted traffic before it all just disappears down the tunnel,
it might turn out to be a good idea.
Regards,
Antony.
--
Anyone that's normal doesn't really achieve much.
- Mark Blair, Australian rocket engineer
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
