RE: iptables: invalid arguement with kernel 2.6.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks guys for pointing out, though I am still confused with the
different between -t nat and -t mangle (on the bridge, and I am not
doing NAT on my network what options should I use) .. I think am going
to read the man page more carefully..

DET 

-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Antony Stone
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 6:34 PM
To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: iptables: invalid arguement with kernel 2.6.5

On Tuesday 04 May 2004 12:00 pm, Det Buaklee wrote:

> /sbin/iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j
> REDIRECT --to-port 8080
>
> or
>
> /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m physdev --physdev-in eth0 -p
> tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8080
>
> and iptables just return
>
> iptables: invalid argument

REDIRECT should be done in the nat table, not the mangle table.

Antony.

-- 
Software development can be quick, high quality, or low cost.

The customer gets to pick any two out of three.

                                                     Please reply to the
list;
                                                           please don't
CC me.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux