Re: Newbie question about nat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    Thank you!
    Now I'd like to set up an ftp server inside with private ip
192.168.1.111 and public ip a.b.c.k
    So the nat rules will be:

        iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d a.b.c.k -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.111
        iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.111 -j SNAT --to a.b.c.k

    However I don't know how to use the ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp
modules when it comes to write the accept/drop rules.
    If the server was a web server, I would use these rules:

        iptables -A FORWARD -d 192.168.1.111 -p tcp --destination-port 80 -m
state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
        iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.1.111 -p tcp --source-port 80 -m
state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

    But how should they be to allow active ftp access to 192.168.1.111 using
the ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp modules?

    Thank you very much in advance!!

    Oriol



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Antony Stone" <Antony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie question about nat


On Friday 30 April 2004 7:20 pm, Oriol Magrané wrote:

>     Hello!
>     I'm trying to set up a firewall with two ethernets to be installed
> between the internet and a pool of servers.
>
>     I have some public ips available (a.b.c.e, a.b.c.f, a.b.c.g,...) so
now
> I want to map the external ip 'a.b.c.e' with the internal ip 192.168.1.100
>
> The only solution I've found is to define an ip alias in the firewall
itself
> so that eth0:1 will respond to the external ip a.b.c.e Thus when the
router
> of my ISP asks "who has ip a.b.c.e?", the firewall will answer "me" and it
> will process the packet and deliver it to the internal server 1.
>
>     But this solution means defining an alias for every external ip I want
> to firewall. So if I have eight servers firewalled I will need eight ip
> alias in the firewall.

Correct.   This is not a problem.

However, it is recommended that you use the new (well, not that new, but
more
recent) "ip" commands to add addresses to interfaces, rather than the
deprecated ethn:x alias method.

Try: "ip addr add a.b.c.e dev eth0" instead of the ifconfig eth0:1 command.

Regards,

Antony.

-- 
"It would appear we have reached the limits of what it is possible to
achieve
with computer technology, although one should be careful with such
statements; they tend to sound pretty silly in five years."

 - John von Neumann (1949)

                                                     Please reply to the
list;
                                                           please don't CC
me.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux