Re: Large number of repeated rules with only differing -s ipaddrs/cidrs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Feizhou wrote:


when will ipset be available in 2.6?


It needs more, exhaustive testing. ippool was tested more widely than
ipset.

Oh...those that mean both can actually be compiled in 2.6?


I presume ippool is going to become obsolete?


Originally ipset was planned to be released as a new version of ippool.
Unfortunately backward compatibility could not be preserved, so a new name
had to be found. It extends ippool, yes, but that does not mean ippool is
obsolete.


Lovely. Does ippool/ipset take ips only or will they also take cidrs?


BTW...mail.so-net.com.hk is an ISP smarthost...could you block so-net.com.hk not coming from 203.99.142.22 instead of a domain rule block on rdns and sender addy?

And maybe all emails from 203.99.142.22 if sender addy not in so-net.com.hk...


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux