> >this assumption is because you're saying 161.x.x.x/21 as destination, >all other destinations that doesnt belong to 161.x.x.x to >161.x.x+8.x+255 will be not nat'ed > right now i just have 1 class C private network. At work i have a static class B ipaddress of 161.x.x.x/255.255.252.0 with the private class C network 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 john http://www.arbbs.net/
