Re: IPTABLES + IPROUTE2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 11:39, L.Malinov wrote:
> Hi Antony,
> 
> According to the iproute2 manual, I can't do routing based on a destination
> port but based on the fwmark. So that's why I think I can achieve that alone
> with iproute2 only and I need iptables to put the mark as well. But in this
> case I'm not sure that this can be achieved on a box with one network card
> only or for traffic generated lacaly from the box. Any suggestions?
<<snip>>
What about the ROUTE patch in POM? You can basically route based on any
criteria possible with iptables.

-- 
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD  00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux