Gesendet: Fr 16.01.2004 18:03
An: netfilter
Betreff: Re: Firewall workaround
most of the IM's today will try first it traditional ports, then
80,
then 443, then 23 , then 25.
Not using some tunneling of forwarding
mechanism like ssh, just a single
connection trough this port.
I know
ssh could forward ports, but in this case, you need the other end
where to
forward the port :)
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 13:54, Antony Stone
wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2004 4:38 pm, Alexis wrote:
>
>
> using port 80 may work too.
>
> But SSH is designed to support
port forwarding - it's part of the standard
> operation. On
port 80 you'd have to come up with some mechanism of your own
> and make
it work.
>
> Antony.
>
> > On Fri, 2004-01-16 at
13:15, Antony Stone wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 January 2004 4:01 pm,
Benjamin Dickgiesser wrote:
> > > > It would be realy nice if
someone could help me with this:
> > > >
> > > >
Situation:
> > > > I am useing a Windows XP PC at a student hall.
To connect to the
> > > > internet I am useing the university
connection. Unfortunatly there are
> > > > only around 5 open
ports (80,21,22,23,6667).
> > > > My aim is to make a work around
to this firewall.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure that's an
appropriate quesion to ask on a security mailing
> > > list, but I
guess you're right in assuming that this is a place to find
> > >
people who know how to do it :)
> > >
> > > Anyway, my
answer to your question is: why not just tunnel the protocols
> > >
you want through SSH port forwarding?
> > >
> > >
Antony
--
Alexis
<alexis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>