RE: Argh! I'm kicking myself

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I KNOW you can have always used the PROTOCOL numbers but the names may have
been recently implemented...as far as where it is documented - in the
frees/wan docs - it talks about the types of rules which you will need in
iptables..

-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Hunter
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:42 PM
To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Argh! I'm kicking myself

For days now I've been trying to figure out how to recompile my Redhat
2.4.20-24.9 kernel to allow masquerading IPSec ESP traffic.  I ran the
much-vaunted "grep -i masq /proc/ksyms" and to my chagrin got nothing back,
but on a lark decided I'd try "iptables -A FORWARD -t nat -i ppp0 -p esp -j
ACCEPT" just to see if it would fly and it did.  Of course.  And now you're
all laughing at me.

Where is this documented, that gre, esp, ah, and the like are acceptable
protocols?  The docs mention icmp, tcp, and udp only.

Is there such a document, or have I discovered a particular cover of the
netfilter doc-hole?

Ian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux