On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:01:41PM +0200, Kostadin Karaivanov wrote: > Hi list, > I just forward ported TTL.patch (attached) from patch-o-matic-20031103 > to linux-2.6.0-test9 for fun and profit. It's rather mechanical port but > it works at least build-in. I've veryfied this with tcpdump. > But I have two questions. First of course is: is this the proper way to > port things like this, couse AFAIC 2.4 and 2.5 networking code is quite > different, if not why. no, I don't see a problem with this 2.6 merge. However, we still don't have a 2.6-ready patch-o-matic (I'm working on it), so I cannot really integrate it somewhere. > And second - where I can read about current > implementation ot linux > networking excetp kernel sources. I doubt there is any information apart from the netdev and linux-kernel mailinglist archives. > wwell Larry. > > P.S please cc me, I'm not subscribet to the list. -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Attachment:
pgp00663.pgp
Description: PGP signature
