2.6.0-test9, bridge firewall, interface specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have a well behaved bridge firewall using 2.4.22 with the relevant P-O-M 
patches applied. In testing 2.6.0-test9 I have determined that interface 
specification on a rule no longer works. For example, the first rule in the 
set that should catch 99% of all inbound TCP packets is

iptables -A FORWARD -i $EXTIF -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT

If the interface is specifed, then this rule does not accrue any packets. Is 
this an expected change in behavior from 2.4.22?
-- 
Tim Gardner - timg@xxxxxxx 406-443-5357
TriplePoint, Inc. - http://www.tpi.com
PGP: http://www.tpi.com/PGP/Tim.txt



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux