Re: delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:56:33PM -0200, Paulo Ricardo Bruck wrote:

> Hi guys
> 
> Just a question. I have a firewall w/ 3 NIC as below:
> 
> 			Internet ADSL
> 			|
> 			|eth1 200.200.200.44/26
> 		_________________________	
> 		|	Firewall	|	DMZ
> 		| iptables 1.2.8	|_eth2 192.168.1.1/24______EMail
> 		|_______________________|			192.168.1.3	
> 			|
> 			| eth0 10.0.0.1/24
> 			LAN
> 
> 
> Firewall : Debian 2.4.22 + iptables 1.2.8
> 
> 
> route:
> 200.200.200.0/26 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 200.200.200.44
> 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.0.0.1
> 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.1
> default via 200.200.200.1 dev eth1
> 
> rules:
> 
> a) iptables -A PREROUTING -d 200.200.200.1 -p tcp -m multiport --dports
> smtp,pop3,imap2,webcache -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.3
> 
> b) iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j SNAT --to-source 200.200.200.1
> 
> c) iptables -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.1.1
> 
> 
> What happens:
> 
> - all desktops ( M$windows) access webmail and email w/ no problems, but
> if I insert rule c) above it causes a delay when any desktop hit
> get/post e-mail in Outlook and it takes +- 40 seconds to "connenct".

Let me not ask you why you have rule (c). But in general a long delay
is most of the time related to a faulty or non-existent reverse DNS.
But in case of SMTP it also might have something to do with ident
being dropped...

Ramin

> 
> I know that must be a silly misconfiguration of something but after 1
> week searching the problem I can't imagine what's wrong.
> 
> Can anybody help me please
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux