Ok thanks, I think I had to but wasn't 100%. Now I can eliminate that is a possibility (Iptables 1.2.8). I finished it late last night so I wasn't in the mood for Googling anything. but tonight I shall. But I would turn away any tips. ;-) Thanks --__--__-- Message: 5 Subject: Re: Noob Question From: Ray Leach <raymondl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Organization: Knowledge Factory Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:25:39 +0200 --=-p9AU5830cWaY0P2ToPWv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 16:13, Kevin Smith wrote: > Does IPtables need to be recompiled every time you roll a new kernel? > I just compiled 2.4.22 and when my firewall (Shorewall) started, it > spit some "device busy" errors with ip_tables.o.=20 > Kev No. The kernel source includes (at least as far as I recall) the iptables kernel space drivers/programs/libraries. The userspace tools (the iptables executables used to manage rules) are separate, and do not get recompiled every time you recompile the kernel. The exception would be if you have iptables v0.1.0 (for example) userspace programs and in your kernel have iptables v1.2.8 source code, then there would be a mismatch, and the userspace programs may be incompatible with the kernel modules. Best to keep them all the same. --=20 -- Raymond Leach <raymondl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Network Support Specialist http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za "lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import" Key fingerprint =3D 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28 --
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
