On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:55:49 +0200, Arnt Karlsen <arnt@xxxxxxx> wrote in message <20031022215549.4b028338.arnt@xxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 06:30:13 +0530, > "Venkatesh. K" <venkatesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message > <009501c39837$e1883850$2800a8c0@karu>: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fernando Barrocal" <fbarrocal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Daniel Chemko" <dchemko@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 > > 4:35 AM Subject: RE: iptables1.2.7 + pptp + rh9 > > > > > > > > > > Let me ask another question ... a newbie one ... > > > > > > Is that order correct ? > > > > > > - apply pptp patch > > > - compile iptables > > > - compile kernel (config, dep, clean, image, modules) > > > > > > > Apply patch > > Compile Kernel > > ..ahem; compile kernel (config, dep, clean, modules, image) ..note to self: first sleep, then wake up and post: ..ahem; compile kernel (config, dep, clean, modules, install) > > Compile IPtables > > ..was also possible possible to apply the pptp patch woih the > "kernelmod" package from poptop.sf.net, last time I checked. > -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
