On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:11:46PM +0200, Lasse B. Jensen wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Harald Welte wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:12:26PM -0400, Chris Brenton wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 10:40, Lasse B. Jensen wrote: > > > > > > > > Is it possible to change the log format of iptables? > > > > > > As others have pointed out this is not possible, however it might make a > > > nice feature to be added in. I've noticed that in high bandwidth > > > environments what chokes throughput the most is logging. > > > > This is why you should use ULOG / ulogd if you log many packets. > > I have now tried with ulog and ulogd and got a much better performance.... > however i seem that the timestamp i ulog i "fucked up". My time on the > machine i fine, but the ulog timestamp says Jan 12 00.04.02 when the > date-output says Okt 8 11.43.22 > > Can anyone give me an explanation? the answer is in the ulogd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailinglist archive, there is also a patch for it (in ulogd CVS). I'm about to release ulogd-1.02 because of that bug. > /Lasse -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Attachment:
pgp00612.pgp
Description: PGP signature
