I wrote a sed script to make my logs viewable ( however I had to download a newer version of sed than the one that came with rh8 as the precompiled version of sed would not support the ability to pipe the output of a tail -f to sed. See my command line command below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- #!/bin/sh dirc=/var/log/messages msed="/usr/local/bin/sed -e" tail -f $dirc |$msed 's/ kernel[^ ]*//;s/ MAC[^ ]*//;s/ LEN=.*PROTO/ PROTO/;s/ CODE=.*//;s/ WINDOW=.*//;G' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- When you run this script you will get output something like this Oct 7 12:42:03 myserver DROP cnet-cdmz: IN=eth2 OUT=eth1 SRC=209.6.195.178 DST=192.168.10.2 PROTO=TCP SPT=3033 DPT=135 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Brenton" <cbrenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Lasse B. Jensen" <gymer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: Re: Change iptables log format (would be a nice feature) > On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 10:40, Lasse B. Jensen wrote: > > > > Is it possible to change the log format of iptables? > > As others have pointed out this is not possible, however it might make a > nice feature to be added in. I've noticed that in high bandwidth > environments what chokes throughput the most is logging. This > materializes as the boxes throughput topping out quicker as well as > garbled/partial log entries being written. > > I *strongly* feel that one of Netfilter's biggest strengths is the level > of detail in the logs and would hate to see that change. When your > pushing high speeds however, your choices come down to collecting > verbose info (and thus limiting throughput) or not collecting log > entries. An option that permits a terse log format (say IPs, ports & > transport only) might be a nice balance. > > Just my $.02, > Chris > > >