Re: load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jonathan G - Mailing List <email-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??
From: Pedro Salazar <pedro-b-salazar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Oct 2003 15:07:08 +0100
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1065447521.1604.174.camel@vitoria.intra.cet.pt>
Organization: Portugal Telecom Inovação, S.A.
References: <1065434375.1604.33.camel@vitoria.intra.cet.pt> <3F81509E.3080600@surestorm.com> <1065447521.1604.174.camel@vitoria.intra.cet.pt>
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> BTW, I'm using Linux Redhat AS 2.1. I believe that could exist a
> solution integrated on it...


Redhat AS only for the application servers and the Oracle RAC. My linux
box with NAT is Redhat 7.3 (now with kernel 2.4.22).

-- 
PS
pedro-b-salazar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP:0E129E31D803BC61

References:
- load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??
  - From: Pedro Salazar
- Re: load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??
  - From: Jonathan G - Mailing List
- Re: load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??
  - From: Pedro Salazar

Prev by Date: Re: Can't DROP spoofed packet. Bug or feature ?
Next by Date: Re: connlimit / iplimit patch
Previous by thread: Re: load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??
Next by thread: Re: load-balancing with netfilter: round robin or what??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux