Re: iptables SNAT and sip "REGISTER"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 08:21:06 +0900, 
Zen Kato <zenkato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
<20030909082106I.zenkato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi Arnt,
> 
> Thank you for your comment.
> I upgraded to RHL-7.3 linux-2.4.20-20.7 and iptables-1.2.8-8.72.3.

..excellent.

> SIP UAs could send and receive "REGISTER", "INVITE", "200 OK", 
> "ACK" and udp media packets via .100.30. So, DNAT/SNAT of iptales-
> 1.2.8 works fine, but both sip phones can not have "audio"?!
> 
> Both sip phones worked fine when I tested using non-NAT with a local
> sip proxy. I don't know why this case does not work.

..pass, I dunno much about VoIP.  This works in your lan but 
not across your firewall?  Does it conflict with nat?

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux