On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:55:28PM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote: > So this means that: > > iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 192.168.30.0/24 -d 192.168.30.11 \ -j MASQUERADE (your solution) > > and > > iptables -I POSTROUTING -t nat -s 192.168.30.0/24 -o $INTDEV -d \ > 192.168.30.11 -j SNAT --to 192.168.30.1 (c/o George Vieira) > > are equivalent (given that 192.168.30.1 is the gateway). They get you to the same place. But it's said that SNAT is more resource efficient. Whit
