Hi! I have now found what I'm looking for! eg.: http://mosquitonet.stanford.edu/mip/ Mobile IP creates a tunnel from R through A to (2). That's what I need. I don't really need a NAT. Thanx for the help, Steve --- Ramin Dousti <ramin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:14:43AM +0800, Stephen > Bylo wrote: > > > If I want *existing* UDP connections to be > diverted, I > > need to change both the NAT table *and* the > connection > > tracking table, is this right? Can somebody tell > me if > > this can be done with iptables? Do I have to hack > the > > code? I may do so if need be. Is there another NAT > > sollution out there that can do what I need? > > Is using a NAT to divert existing UDP streams > > technically possible? > > I think one way of doing this is to reduce the > conntrack timeout for > UDP to almost nihil so that you see the effect of > adding 2 to the nat > immidiately. But in that case UDP returns would not > benefit from the > implicit conntrack structure and you need to allow > the return traffic > explicitly. > > Ramin > > > > > Thanx for your help. > > Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send free SMS from your PC! http://sg.sms.yahoo.com
