Re: OUTPUT chain DNAT problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Fox <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OUTPUT chain DNAT problem
From: Ramin Dousti <ramin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:31:07 -0400
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1591512625.20030703125614@flshlnk.com>
References: <09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A15BEC7@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au> <1591512625.20030703125614@flshlnk.com>
Sender: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:56:14PM +0500, Fox wrote:

> I don't understand the reasons why iptables cannot SNAT in PREROUTING
> or DNAT in POSTROUTING.

It's because of the routing. It might confuse the kernel for making the
routing decision.

Ramin

References:
- RE: OUTPUT chain DNAT problem
  - From: George Vieira
- Re[2]: OUTPUT chain DNAT problem
  - From: Fox

Prev by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] rh7.3 / rh9 / cl9 RPMS of iptables-1.2.8 and ulogd-1.0.0
Next by Date: Re: Memory problem
Previous by thread: Re[2]: OUTPUT chain DNAT problem
Next by thread: ip_conntrack: max number of expected connections....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux