It seems that you missed the INPUT chain: you must accept INPUT before FORWARD. But first of all, try 'debugging' your network removing all iptables rules and setting the default policies to "ACCEPT". You should see packets going from one "LAN" to other. One more doubt: did you check that the default gateway of your workstations are correctly set? Regards, Jose Hime -----Original Message----- From: netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:netfilter-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of tsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:39 AM To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: routing between 2 nets on same LAN I sent this before subscribing to the list, so apologies to the moderator for duplication. I'm trying to use iptables to route between two networks on the same LAN. I'm attempting to migrate our ip addresses from a bunch of global subnets (131.111.x/y/z.*) to 10. and to use NAT thereafter, and I was hoping to be able to use iptables to route between these address ranges whilst the migration was in progress. I have entries like: iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -s 131.111.26.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/9 iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -d 10.0.0.0/9 -s 131.111.26.0/24 and IP_FORWARDING turned on, but when I try 'ping 131.111.26.1' from 10.0.0.1, I get no ICMP echo. On the iptables box, tcpdump -i eth0 src 10.0.0.1 dst 131.111.26.1 sees the ICMP packets. The firewall eth0 has 2 ip addresses, 131.111.26.200 and 10.0.0.200 ('using ip address add'). 10.0.0.1 has 10.0.0.200 as its default router and 131.111.26.1 has 131.111.26.200 as its default router. Each can successfully ping, and be ping'd by, the firewall. Is it legit in iptables to have the FORWARD input and output interfaces the same? Or am I doing something wrong? Cheers, Terry. Terry Horsnell (tsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) I.T. Manager Medical Research Council Lab of Molecular Biology Hills Road CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QH U.K. Phone: +44 (0)1223 248011 Fax: +44 (0)1223 213556
