Re: Need for GLIBC 2.3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:41:04 -0700, 
Carol Anne Ogdin <caogdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
<OFCE07B0DA.63D2DEA4-ON88256D0C.0002759A-88256D0C.0003C28A@xxxxxxxxxxxx
m>:

> Red Hat 7.3 (v2.4.18) supplies iptables v1.2.5, which relies on glibc
> v2.2.5.  I'd like to apply the rpm for v1.2.7a, but the RH distro
> demands glibc v2.3.
> I've looked through the changelogs and don't see any particular
> requirement for glibc v2.3 and I'm wondering if it would be safe to
> install the rpm and ignore it's dependency on glibc 2.3.
> 
> Alternatively, I could put glibc v2.3 on the RH 7.3, the install
> iptables v1.2.7a.
> 
> What would you do?

..'rpmbuild -ta iptables-1.2.8.tar.bz2' or somesuch, 
should use what you have in your box.  
You _may_ have to chuck in a few *-devel.rpm's etc, 
rpm should whine which to 'rpm -ivh'.

> (I plan to upgrade to RH 9 when I have time, but that has other
> consequences and I want to make sure I test my configuration first,
> but in the meantime, I need to see if a later iptables will fix a
> problem I've having.)
> 
> --Carol Anne
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux