RE: RFC 3514 support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Toggled bit randomness? Are you sure that is secure. I see a big pile of
trouble resulting from this e-bit. What about timing attacks using ebit
detection! Ack, I just got hacked by the evil bit of my own sinister
personality. Crud puppies!


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott MacKay [mailto:scottmackay@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:36 AM
To: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RFC 3514 support?

I plan to add it into my userspace mangler, but only
for suspicious source IP addresses (like ones which
resolve with dangerous works like 'sinister')   :)

I also intend to shortcut some of the design for item
(4) by simply having a toggled bit to determine if it
should be on or off (thus achieving true, pure, even
randomness)...

-Scott

--- Bob Keyes <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am wondering if there are any plans to support RFC
> 3514 in netfilter?
> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt
> 
> Specifically, I'd like to tag all kazaa packets.


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://platinum.yahoo.com




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux