Re: another conntrack table query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hello,
	one more thing on what basis the time for UNREPLIED entries gets
reset? is there a link where such things are explained in detail?


thanks for your help.

with regards,
nimit.

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Athan wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:10:23PM +0530, Nimit Gupta wrote:
> > hello,
> > 	can somebody point me to a link or answer why does the conntrack table
> > keeps the entry for connections marked as TIME_WAIT, and if it is not so
> > useful how can i remove them as soon as the connection finishes.
>
>   My guess would be because it is still waiting for the remote end to
> fully close the connection.  This means there's the possibility of
> further packets getting sent to that local ip:port.  If you delete the
> entry and the port gets reused you'll possibly have two remote ip:port's
> both trying to send traffic to the same local ip:port and causing
> erroneous RSTs of the connection.
>
>   Or something like that.
>
> -Ath




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux