On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 15:58, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > You said "the only one I've managed to patch-o-matic" which means the
> > only one you've managed to patch. What you are saying now is that you
> > indeed did manage to patch your kernel. Please use more accurate wording
> > in reports like these.
>
> the only one I have been able to patch up with the patch-o-matic pptp patch,
> was 2.4.18.
>
> > And you are NOT using patch-o-matic from cvs, I know this because these
> > problems were fixed some time ago (and doublechecking the files I see
> > that they were indeed fixed). The error you are seeing is _impossible_
> > with patch-o-matic from cvs (the #error lines doesn't even exist)
>
> I've tried all the ones I can find.
> When trying to apply the pptp-conntrack-nat.patch, I get errors applying it.
> Do I need to hand patch this thing? I've tried with 2.4.{18,19,20}
Did you run './runme pending' first like the documentation tells you?
--
/Martin
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat
you with experience.
