when I run DHCRELAY -i eth2 it tells me that it is listening on eth2 and sending on eth2. I assume this is wrong? how do I fix it? is it my routing table? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Antony Stone" <Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: Re: DHCRELAY through IPTABLES Firewall > On Tuesday 29 October 2002 11:20 am, bigman@monster-solutions.net wrote: > > > below is what gets logged when using DHCRELAY. It looks like it will work > > but then I never see the request from the 192.168.2.69 (firewall) hit the > > DHCP server which I am running a sniffer on. I must be making this harder > > then it should be. Can you provide me with the steps to get DHCRELAY > > working across different subnets. I really appreciate all of the help. > > > > Oct 29 07:13:12 firewall kernel: IN=eth2 OUT= > > MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:08:00:09:f1:b2:ba:08:00 SRC=0.0.0.0 > > DST=255.255.255.255 LEN=328 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=8523 PROTO=UDP > > SPT=68 DPT=67 LEN=308 > > Packet comes in on eth2 with broadcast destination IP and MAC adresses, > source IP address = 0.0.0.0 > > > Oct 29 07:13:12 firewall kernel: IN= OUT=eth2 SRC=192.168.2.69 > > DST=192.168.1.70 LEN=328 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=67 > > DPT=67 LEN=308 > > The the firewall sends a packet from its own IP address 192.168.2.69 to the > DHCP server 192.168.1.70 on *eth2* !!! > > Why ? > > > Oct 29 07:13:27 firewall kernel: IN=eth2 OUT= > > MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:08:00:09:f1:b2:ba:08:00 SRC=0.0.0.0 > > DST=255.255.255.255 LEN=328 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=8537 PROTO=UDP > > SPT=68 DPT=67 LEN=308 > > DHCP client hasn't had an answer within 15 seconds so it asks again. > > > Oct 29 07:13:27 firewall kernel: IN= OUT=eth2 SRC=192.168.2.69 > > DST=192.168.1.70 LEN=328 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=67 > > DPT=67 LEN=308 > > Firewall sends the request to 192.168.1.70 out of the wrong interface again. > > Antony. > > -- > > Normal people think "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". > Engineers think "if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet". >