DNAT, SNAT, port ranges and protocols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 28 October 2002 11:33 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   from the iptables man page, for both SNAT and DNAT targets,
> we have the (similar) excerpts:
>
>   --to-{source|destination}  ipaddr[-ipaddr][:port-port]
>
> 	which can specify a single new {source|destination} address,
> 	an inclusive range of IP addresses, and optionally, a
> 	port range (which is only valid if the rule also specified
> 	-p tcp or -p udp)
>
> so, what part of that requires the protocol specifier?  having
> a range of IP addresses?  or just having a port range?  or both?
> it's somewhat ambiguously worded.

Only if you specify a port range.

The "is" inside the brackets refers to the "range" immediately before :-)

Antony.

-- 

All matter in the Universe can be placed into one of two categories:

1. things which need to be fixed
2. things which will need to be fixed once you've had a few minutes to play 
with them



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux