messages in /var/log/message file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi
thanx for responding. some info to you all...
the linux box with 2.4.19 kernel & iptables 1.2.7a has 768mb ram its 
ip_conntrack_max shows 48632.
moreover the ip(=>> ipA) in the message file is a valid ip and not a 
private one & its going to a valid ip in internet.
the very interesting & confusing part for me(& hope for others?? ) is 
why a day ago with iptables 1.2.6a there was no error message ???.. as i 
mentioned in last mail the only difference is that i have as module--> 
ip_nat_h323.o & also ipt_helper.o
one last info to add here---why only this message for >>ipA<< when the 
box is handling more than 500 valid ip & above 200 private ip( of 10 
series),..slabinfo shows...
ip_conntrack        5150   6660    320  490  555  1

pls i need help to know where things went wrong for me.. if someone else 
have experienced the same can they give their experience/suggestions ??
thanx in anticipation...
A.H

Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
 >>Oct  9 12:25:24 ICG kernel: NET: 5 messages suppressed.
 >>Oct  9 12:26:31 ICG kernel: NET: 1 messages suppressed.
 >>Oct  9 12:26:31 ICG kernel: ip_conntrack: max number of expected 
 >>connections 1 of ftp reached for <ipA> -> <ipB>, reusing
 >>Oct  9 12:27:12 ICG kernel: ip_conntrack: max number of expected 
 >>connections 1 of ftp reached for <ipA> -> <ipB>, reusing
>>these messages are piling the message file.
>>am cusrious now why so ?.. what does this message signify ?
> 
> Read the FAQ, and then increase your /proc/net/ip_conntrack_max
> 
> Best Regards,
> Maciej Soltysiak
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux