problems with nat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Russo wrote:

>Since you are working on this anyway....
>
>For a slightly more secure setup, you might want to consider:
>
>
>               R              E          I           
>               T+--------+    X+--------+N          
> internet |---|R| router |---|T|firewall|T|---| intranet
>               I+--------+    I+--------+I        
>               P              P     |     P
>				    |
>				    DMZ IP
>					\
>					| HTTP, MAIL, SSH
>
>This will protect your servers from other intranet users 
>on the same subnet. (Also if you have 802.11 on your intranet...)
>
>Maybe after doing this your problem will disappear simply by 
>rethinking the ruleset.
>
>-Ben.
>
>
>On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 13:13, Rahul Jadhav wrote:
>  
>
>>please check the attachment...
>>
>>Thanks
>>Rahul
>>    
>>
You are right but I am trying to avoid doing that right now as i have 
invested a lot of time already into this system. Moreover, I am pretty 
sure there are people who have got iptables working with a setup like mine.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux