Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nadia Pinaeva writes: > I am working on a tool that allows collecting network performance > metrics by using conntrack events. > Start time of a conntrack entry is used to evaluate seen_reply > latency, therefore the sooner it is timestamped, the better the > precision is. > In particular, when using this tool to compare the performance of the > same feature implemented using iptables/nftables/OVS it is crucial > to have the entry timestamped earlier to see any difference. > > At this time, conntrack events can only get timestamped at recv time in > userspace, so there can be some delay between the event being generated > and the userspace process consuming the message. Ping, should I resend this patch?
