On Monday 2025-01-06 15:22, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> x86_64-before: >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 716 432 0 1148 47c xt_dscp.o >> 1142 432 0 1574 626 xt_DSCP.o >> 593 224 0 817 331 xt_hl.o >> 934 224 0 1158 486 xt_HL.o >> 1099 120 0 1219 4c3 xt_rateest.o >> 2126 365 4 2495 9bf xt_RATEEST.o >> 747 224 0 971 3cb xt_tcpmss.o >> 2824 352 0 3176 c68 xt_TCPMSS.o >> total data: 2373 >> >> x86_64-after: >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 1709 848 0 2557 9fd xt_dscp.o >> 1352 448 0 1800 708 xt_hl.o >> 3075 481 4 3560 de8 xt_rateest.o >> 3423 576 0 3999 f9f xt_tcpmss.o >> total data: 2353 > >So you have saved 20 bytes in the data segment. A 0.8% reduction. If i >was developing this patchset, when i see this number, i would >immediately think, why am i bothering? Before: $ lsmod xt_TCPMSS 12288 0 xt_tcpmss 12288 0 After: $ lsmod xt_tcpmss 12288 0 which is a 50% reduction in run-time memory use.