[libnftnl PATCH 1/3] set: Fix for array overrun when setting NFTNL_SET_DESC_CONCAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Assuming max data_len of 16 * 4B and no zero bytes in 'data':
The while loop will increment field_count, use it as index for the
field_len array and afterwards make sure it hasn't increased to
NFT_REG32_COUNT. Thus a value of NFT_REG32_COUNT - 1 (= 15) will pass
the check, get incremented to 16 and used as index to the 16 fields long
array.
Use a less fancy for-loop to avoid the increment vs. check problem.

Fixes: 407f616ea5318 ("set: buffer overflow in NFTNL_SET_DESC_CONCAT setter")
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
---
 src/set.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/set.c b/src/set.c
index f127c19b7b8b8..5746397277c48 100644
--- a/src/set.c
+++ b/src/set.c
@@ -185,8 +185,10 @@ int nftnl_set_set_data(struct nftnl_set *s, uint16_t attr, const void *data,
 			return -1;
 
 		memcpy(&s->desc.field_len, data, data_len);
-		while (s->desc.field_len[++s->desc.field_count]) {
-			if (s->desc.field_count >= NFT_REG32_COUNT)
+		for (s->desc.field_count = 0;
+		     s->desc.field_count < NFT_REG32_COUNT;
+		     s->desc.field_count++) {
+			if (!s->desc.field_len[s->desc.field_count])
 				break;
 		}
 		break;
-- 
2.47.0





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux