On 11/1/2024 9:42 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 12:14 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 11/1/2024 12:25 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:58:13PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: >>>>> On 10/31/2024 4:23 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:15:16AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Paul, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patch breaks nf_conntrack_netlink, Casey mentioned that he will >>>>>>> post another series. >>>>> I have a fix, it is pretty simple. How about I send a 6/5 patch for it? >>>> No idea. I don't know what is the status of this series. I would >>>> suggest to repost a new series. >>> I will post v4 shortly. Thanks for the feedback. >> Please just post a fix against v2 using lsm/dev as a base. > That should have been "against *v3* using lsm/dev as a base". > > Also, since I didn't explicitly mention it, if I don't see a fix by > dinner time tonight (US East Coast), I'll revert this patchset, but > I'd like to avoid that if possible. I will have this as quickly as I can. The patch is easy, but the overhead may slow it down a bit. I should have it in time to avoid the revert. > Sorry for the screw-up on my end folks, I was trying to get things > done before Halloween kicked off and it looks like I was a bit too > hasty in my review/merging. >
