Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/9] net: ip: add drop reasons to input route

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 8:03 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:33:39 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
> > In this series, we mainly add some skb drop reasons to the input path of
> > ip routing, and we make the following functions return drop reasons:
> >
> >   fib_validate_source()
> >   ip_route_input_mc()
> >   ip_mc_validate_source()
> >   ip_route_input_slow()
> >   ip_route_input_rcu()
> >   ip_route_input_noref()
> >   ip_route_input()
> >   ip_mkroute_input()
> >   __mkroute_input()
> >   ip_route_use_hint()
> >
> > And following new skb drop reasons are added:
> >
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCAL_SOURCE
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_SOURCE
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCALNET
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_DEST
>
> We're "a bit" behind on patches after my vacation, so no real review
> here, but please repost with net-next in the subject. The test
> automation trusts the tree designation and bpf-next is no longer
> based on net-next. So this doesn't apply.

I was wondering how the conflict, which was checked by bpf-ci,
happened, as there was no conflict between this series and
net-next. And now I see, I just tagged a wrong branch for this
series. Sorry about that, and I'll resend it to the right branch.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong


> --
> pw-bot: cr





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux