On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 8:03 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:33:39 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote: > > In this series, we mainly add some skb drop reasons to the input path of > > ip routing, and we make the following functions return drop reasons: > > > > fib_validate_source() > > ip_route_input_mc() > > ip_mc_validate_source() > > ip_route_input_slow() > > ip_route_input_rcu() > > ip_route_input_noref() > > ip_route_input() > > ip_mkroute_input() > > __mkroute_input() > > ip_route_use_hint() > > > > And following new skb drop reasons are added: > > > > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCAL_SOURCE > > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_SOURCE > > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCALNET > > SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_DEST > > We're "a bit" behind on patches after my vacation, so no real review > here, but please repost with net-next in the subject. The test > automation trusts the tree designation and bpf-next is no longer > based on net-next. So this doesn't apply. I was wondering how the conflict, which was checked by bpf-ci, happened, as there was no conflict between this series and net-next. And now I see, I just tagged a wrong branch for this series. Sorry about that, and I'll resend it to the right branch. Thanks! Menglong Dong > -- > pw-bot: cr