Re: [PATCH nf-next 5/7] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splats with basechain hook

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 5/7] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splats with basechain hook
From: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:40:26 +0200
Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20241025133230.22491-6-fw@strlen.de>
Mail-followup-to: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>, Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:32:22PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Like previous patches: iteration is ok if the lost cannot be altered in

Typo: lost -> list

References:
- [PATCH nf-next 0/7] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid PROVE_RCU_LIST splats
  - From: Florian Westphal
- [PATCH nf-next 5/7] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splats with basechain hook
  - From: Florian Westphal

Prev by Date: [PATCH nf-next 7/7] netfilter: nf_tables: must hold rcu read lock while iterating object type list
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH nf-next 1/7] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splat on rule deletion
Previous by thread: [PATCH nf-next 5/7] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splats with basechain hook
Next by thread: [PATCH nf-next 6/7] netfilter: nf_tables: must hold rcu read lock while iterating expression type list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netfitler Users] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [LARTC] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux