On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:30:58PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> [...]
> > - With your patch applied, 20 rules fail (in both variants). Is this
> > expected or a bug on my side?
>
> OK, so most failures are caused by my test kernel not having
> CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 enabled.
>
> Apart from that, there is a minor bug in introduced libip6t_recent.t in
> that it undoes commit d859b91e6f3ed ("extensions: recent: New kernels
> support 999 hits") by accident. More interesting though, it's reported
> twice, once for fast mode and once for normal mode. I'll see how I can
> turn off error reporting in fast mode, failing tests are repeated
> anyway.
Would you point me to the relevant line in the libip6t_recent.t?
Thanks.
