On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:57:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in the netfilter-next tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
>
> 3478b99fc515 ("netfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_trans_elem_alloc helper")
> 73e467915aab ("netfilter: nf_tables: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad")
> 0398cffb7459 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Fix percpu address space issues in nf_tables_api.c")
> cb3d289366b0 ("netfilter: Make legacy configs user selectable")
>
> These are commits
>
> 08e52cccae11 ("netfilter: nf_tables: prefer nft_trans_elem_alloc helper")
> 544dded8cb63 ("netfilter: nf_tables: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad")
> 0741f5559354 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Fix percpu address space issues in nf_tables_api.c")
> 6c959fd5e173 ("netfilter: Make legacy configs user selectable")
>
> in the netfilter-next tree.
>
> These have already caused an unnecessary conflict due to further commits
> in the ipvs-next tree. Maybe you could share a stable branch?
That was the result of a rebase, moving forward I will keep PR in a
separated branch until they are merged upstream to avoid this
situation.
