Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/3] netfilter: conntrack: clash resolution for reverse collisions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Florian,

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> This series resolves an esoteric scenario.
> 
> Given two tasks sending UDP packets to one another, NAT engine
> can falsely detect a port collision if it happens to pick up
> a reply packet as 'new' rather than 'reply'.
> 
> First patch adds extra code to detect this and suppress port
> reallocation in this case.
> 
> Second patch extends clash resolution logic to detect such
> a reverse clash (clashing conntrack is reply to existing entry).
> 
> Patch 3 adds a test case.
> 
> Since this has existed forever and hasn't been reported in two
> decades I'm submitting this for -next.

-next is now closed, my plan is to place this series in nf.git for the
next PR.

nf-next will remain open in this cycle so hopefully we can merge your
updates to reduce memory footprint in the next -rc.

I cannot go any faster.




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux