[PATCH nf-next,v2 2/9] netfilter: nf_tables: reject element expiration with no timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If element timeout is unset and set provides no default timeout, the
element expiration is silently ignored, reject this instead to let user
know this is unsupported.

Also prepare for supporting timeout that never expire, where zero
timeout and expiration must be also rejected.

Fixes: 8e1102d5a159 ("netfilter: nf_tables: support timeouts larger than 23 days")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: remove leftover sentence in patch description, as per Phil.

 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 6de74dae50fc..1884125ebb28 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -6917,6 +6917,9 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
 	if (nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_EXPIRATION] != NULL) {
 		if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_TIMEOUT))
 			return -EINVAL;
+		if (timeout == 0)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 		err = nf_msecs_to_jiffies64(nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_EXPIRATION],
 					    &expiration);
 		if (err)
-- 
2.30.2





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux