Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use kfunc hooks instead of program types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:03 AM Matteo Croce <technoboy85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Pass to register_btf_kfunc_id_set() a btf_kfunc_hook directly, instead
> of a bpf_prog_type.
> Many program types share the same kfunc hook, so some calls to
> register_btf_kfunc_id_set() can be removed.
>
> Tested compiling the kernel with -Werror=enum-conversion to catch all
> the occourrences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@xxxxxxxx>

I think it's too soon to do this kind of cleanup.
We need to refactor this logic to accommodate sched-ext
allow/deny pattern for kfunc per struct-ops hook.
Let's keep this code as-is for now.
pw-bot: cr





[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux