Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not lower timeout to CLOSE for in-window RSTs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 5 Jul 2024, Florian Westphal wrote:

> yyxRoy <yyxroy22@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > With previous commit https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/be0502a
> > ("netfilter: conntrack: tcp: only close if RST matches exact sequence")
> > to fight against TCP in-window reset attacks, current version of netfilter
> > will keep the connection state in ESTABLISHED, but lower the timeout to
> > that of CLOSE (10 seconds by default) for in-window TCP RSTs, and wait for
> > the peer to send a challenge ack to restore the connection timeout
> > (5 mins in tests).
> > 
> > However, malicious attackers can prevent incurring challenge ACKs by
> > manipulating the TTL value of RSTs. The attacker can probe the TTL value
> > between the NAT device and itself and send in-window RST packets with
> > a TTL value to be decreased to 0 after arriving at the NAT device.
> > This causes the packet to be dropped rather than forwarded to the
> > internal client, thus preventing a challenge ACK from being triggered.
> > As the window of the sequence number is quite large (bigger than 60,000
> > in tests) and the sequence number is 16-bit, the attacker only needs to
> > send nearly 60,000 RST packets with different sequence numbers
> > (i.e., 1, 60001, 120001, and so on) and one of them will definitely
> > fall within in the window.
> > 
> > Therefore we can't simply lower the connection timeout to 10 seconds
> > (rather short) upon receiving in-window RSTs. With this patch, netfilter
> > will lower the connection timeout to that of CLOSE only when it receives
> > RSTs with exact sequence numbers (i.e., old_state != new_state).
> 
> This effectively ignores most RST packets, which will clog up the
> conntrack table (established timeout is 5 days).
> 
> I don't think there is anything sensible that we can do here.
> 
> Also, one can send train with data packet + rst and we will hit
> the immediate close conditional:
> 
>    /* Check if rst is part of train, such as
>     *   foo:80 > bar:4379: P, 235946583:235946602(19) ack 42
>     *   foo:80 > bar:4379: R, 235946602:235946602(0)  ack 42
>     */
>     if (ct->proto.tcp.last_index == TCP_ACK_SET &&
>         ct->proto.tcp.last_dir == dir &&
>         seq == ct->proto.tcp.last_end)
>             break;
> 
> So even if we'd make this change it doesn't prevent remote induced
> resets.
> 
> Conntrack cannot validate RSTs precisely due to lack of information,
> only the endpoints can do this.

I fully agree with Florian: conntrack plays the role of a middle box and 
cannot absolutely know the right seq/ack numbers of the client/server 
sides. Add NAT on top of that and there are a couple of ways to attack a 
given traffic. I don't see a way by which the checkings/parameters could 
be tightened without blocking real traffic.
 
Best regards,
Jozsef
-- 
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxx
PGP key : https://wigner.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux