Hi, Phil. At the beginning of the year you committed 34f085b16073 ("Revert "xshared: Print protocol numbers if --numeric was given""), which reverts da8ecc62dd76 ("xshared: Print protocol numbers if --numeric was given"). In response to a Debian bug-report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067733 I applied the change to the iptables package and uploaded it. However, this caused test failures in the Debian CI pipeline for firewalld because its test-suite has been updated to expect the new numeric protocol output. Michael Biebl, the firewalld Debian maintainer, (cc'ed so he can correct me if I misquote him) raised a point which I think has some merit. It is now eighteen months since 1.8.9 was released. One imagines that the majority of iptables users, who presumably are not building iptables directly from git, must, therefore, have adjusted to the new output. Is it, then, worth it to revert this change and force them to undo that work after what may have been a couple of years by the time 1.8.11 comes out? What do you think? J.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature