Hi Pablo, Le 26/06/2024 à 13:41, Pablo Neira Ayuso a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 03:54:38PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: >> Since the below commit, there are regressions for legacy setups: >> 1/ conntracks are created while there are no listener >> 2/ a listener starts and dumps all conntracks to get the current state >> 3/ conntracks deleted before the listener has started are not advertised >> >> This is problematic in containers, where conntracks could be created early. >> This sysctl is part of unsafe sysctl and could not be changed easily in >> some environments. >> >> Let's switch back to the legacy behavior. > > Maybe it is possible to annotate destroy events in a percpu area if > the conntrack extension is not available. This code used to follow > such approach time ago. Thanks for the feedback. I was wondering if just sending the destroy event would be possible. TBH, I'm not very familiar with this part of the code, I need to dig a bit. I won't have time for this right now, any help would be appreciated.
