On 6/27/24 22:44, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:30:24PM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: >> On 6/26/24 20:34, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 6/26/24 18:04, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 12:51:49AM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: >>>>> On 6/23/24 00:48, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: >>>>>> On 6/22/24 22:49, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a fix on the table address this, I will submit is in the next >>>>>>> pull request. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please consider adding Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for reporting >>>>>> >>>>>> No big deal. Anytime :-) >>>>> >>>>> P.S. >>>>> >>>>> Please notify when I could test the same .config with your fix. >>>> >>>> Patch is here: >>>> >>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf.git/commit/?id=aef5daa2c49d510436b733827d4f0bab79fcc4a0 >>> >>> Build error has gone, tested in the same environment. Please find the build output attached. >>> >>> Tested-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorov@69@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Apology, please, the right email is this: >> >> Tested-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks a lot for testing. Not at all - I think that testing whether the patch fixed the problem in the initial environment adds to QA. > Patch is already flying upstream, I missed adding this tag. But I > could include your Reported-by: tag. In the Internet space-time contiuum, you actually did not miss a thing, because my testing is a logical consequence of your patch, and could not have preceded it, so that the Tested-by would be in the original patch ;-) As Lord Merovingi said, "cause and effect" ;-) Best regards, Mirsad Todorovac