[PATCH 4.19 188/213] netfilter: nft_dynset: relax superfluous check on set updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 7b1394892de8d95748d05e3ee41e85edb4abbfa1 upstream.

Relax this condition to make add and update commands idempotent for sets
with no timeout. The eval function already checks if the set element
timeout is available and updates it if the update command is used.

Fixes: 22fe54d5fefc ("netfilter: nf_tables: add support for dynamic set updates")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c |   10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
@@ -154,16 +154,8 @@ static int nft_dynset_init(const struct
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	priv->op = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_DYNSET_OP]));
-	switch (priv->op) {
-	case NFT_DYNSET_OP_ADD:
-		break;
-	case NFT_DYNSET_OP_UPDATE:
-		if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_TIMEOUT))
-			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		break;
-	default:
+	if (priv->op > NFT_DYNSET_OP_UPDATE)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
 
 	timeout = 0;
 	if (tb[NFTA_DYNSET_TIMEOUT] != NULL) {






[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux